WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIESWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland#Article sourcing expectations (9 May 2021):
The Arbitration Committee advises that administrators may impose "reliable-source consensus required" as a discretionary sanction on all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. On articles where "reliable-source consensus required" is in effect, when a source that is not a high quality source (an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journals, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution) is added and subsequently challenged by reversion, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
In the Commemoration in Ukraine section the picture titiled "March of UPA veterans through Przemyśl' should be removed. Przemyśl is in Poland and since 2007 when this picture was taken the display of UPA symbology in public is illegal, making this image rather outdated. 94.172.109.57 (talk) 09:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that many Russian Wikipedia users are eager to justify the accusation of "Nazism" against anyone, who is condemned by their government. But my question is: how can we seriously claim that UPA, a Ukrainian nationalist organization, was Nazi (factions?) if the very ideology of 'Nazism' claims that Ukrainians are "subhumans"? This is absurd. UPA was xenophobic, totalitarian and committedcrimes against civilians, but callkng it Nazi is the same as calling the Communist Party, or Israeli Army Nazi. Skoropadsky (talk) 23:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The reference that UPA was engaged in guerrilla warfare against Nazi Germany should be moved to the end after Soviet Union and Poland/Polish civilians, out of all three, UPA fought the Germans the least (not to mention collaborated with them) and when they did fight, most of the time it was becuase the Germans attacked UPA. The way the text in the indroduction section reads now, it presents a misleading narrative that Nazi Germay was UPAs first enemy and that is clearly not the case. In fact, UPA killed by far more Polish civilians than anybody else, and that just shows how limited their attacks on the Germans or even the Soviets were. Out of all three, the massacres of Poles was UPA's most significant action and by far. 60,000-100,000 Polish civilians killed compared with 8,786 Soviet troops and even less German troops (some estimates put the figure at only several hundrend and not even thousands). 94.172.109.57 (talk) 12:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To add, I would argue that the massacres of Poles was UPAs most significant undertaking, given how limited the scope of their actions were against the Germans and Soviets, and at the very least the Indroduction section should place Nazi Germany at the end. --94.172.109.57 (talk) 13:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
